Legal Disclaimer
My News Digest
Washington Post Forum Postings
Washington Post Forum Profile/Legal Disclaimer
Mayor of Yountville
Cynthia Saucerman
6550 Yount Street
Yountville, CA 94599
Phone: 707-948-2636
e-mail: csaucerman@yville.com
Mayor of St. Helena
Del Britton
(707) 963-5635 (h)
City of St. Helena
1480 Main Street, St. Helena, CA 94574
Mayor Of Napa
Jill Techel
c/o City Hall 955 School Street
PO Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660
Work Phone: 707-258-7876
E-mail: jtechel@cityofnapa.org
Mayor Of Napa Jill Techel – Home
1075 Round Hill Cir.
Napa, CA 94558-5320
Home Phone: 707-255-6054
E-mail: MayorJill@aol.com
Napa County District Attorney
Gary Allen Lieberstein
Duties as Public Prosecutor
931 Parkway Mall
Napa, CA 94559-2647
Office Phone
(707) 253-4211
Office Fax
(707) 253-4041
e-mail: District_Attorney_Office@co.napa.ca.us
Harry V. Martin
Napa Board Of Supervisors Candidate
1627 Lincoln Ave
Napa, CA 94558-4827
(707) 253-8186
e-mail: sentinel@napanet.net
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916-445-2841
Fax: 916-558-3160
e-mail: governor@govmail.ca.gov
President George W. Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 2050
Phone Numbers:
Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414
FAX: 202-456-2461
e-mail: president@whitehouse.gov
And the City and County of Napa, The State of California, United States et al:
Video Of Our Son
Updated: The True Story – Authentic Document
Parental Rights Documented: Proof
The Reason Custom Event Group Breaks The Law:
Original E-Mail To The Mayors
Note: Click On This Web Link Below And See How Close:
Mayor of Yountville – Home
Cynthia Saucerman
2011 Webber Ave
Yountville, CA 94599-1379
(707) 944-1852
Lives To The Perpetrators:
Criminal Behavior Profile 1
Criminal Behavior Profile 2
Alfred Richard Woodson III and
Rev. Carolyn Lorraine Strong Woodson
2004 Humboldt Street
Yountville, California 94559
Home Phone: 707-944-2038
e-mail: woodsonar@sbcglobal.net
e-mail: cswoodson@sbcglobal.net
Google Map
The Guardians, Alfred Richard Woodson III and
Carolyn Lorraine Strong Woodson,
Have Violated The California Penal Codes:
Neglect-Abandonment-Conspiracy-Concealment
Abduction- False Imprisonment- Kidnapping.
Click On This Link: California Penal Code
Mayors Of The Napa Valley Attention: Abduction
Jeffrey Feeney’s Criminal Background Attached and
Case Lookup Web Link And Contact Information Listed Below:
Click On Link Below And Type In The Name Jeffrey Feeney And Click Submit:
Napa County Case Lookup
Prima Facie On This Day Of June 12th 2008
On Sunday, June 8, 2008, it was reported to my fiancé,
James A. Sablan Sr., and myself, Sarah Lorraine Matlock,
that our infant son, James Matlock Funes, was abducted/illegally
adopted by the individuals listed below, and is presently in imminent
danger. I am enclosing attaching Jeffrey Feeney’s criminal background:
Jeffrey and Rebecca Feeney
Unlawful Custodians Detaining And Concealing “Child”
The Reason Custom Event Group Breaks The Law:
1094 Valley View St.
Saint Helena, CA 94574-2346
Phone: (707) 968-9445
Cell Number: (707) 580-5678
Fax number (707) 968-9437
with the assistance of:
James Vaughn Jones
Attorney At Law
State Bar Number: 40883
1564 First Street
Napa, CA, 94559
Work Phone: (707) 252-8644
E-mail: onecal1@saber.net
Our parental rights have not been terminated,
and there is no California jurisdiction over our child.
We are seeking the immediate return of our son.
This was reported to us directly by Sarah Matlock’s
older son, Jeffrey Alexander Funes, who has been
living in this house from which he was abducted.
We also have evidence in writing that this was
premeditated by the perpetrators,
Alfred Richard Woodson III and
Rev. Carolyn Lorraine Strong Woodson
2004 Humboldt Street
Yountville, California 94559
Home Phone: 707-944-2038
e-mail: woodsonar@sbcglobal.net
e-mail: cswoodson@sbcglobal.net
who are Montana-appointed guardians of our baby.
They have no paperwork filed in the State of California
and no legal adoption papers filed in the Napa Courthouse.
Prior to this, the baby had also been maliciously concealed
by the perpetrators for approximately eight months, for
which we also have proof.
We have evidence in writing and by eyewitnesses that this
adoption had already been in process, and this fact was
also confirmed by:
Investigator: William Jabin
Napa County District Attorney’s Office Child Abduction Unit
931 Parkway Mall
Napa, CA 94559-2647
Work: (707) 253-4356
e-mail: WJABIN@co.napa.ca.us
Amazingly, Napa County is not concerned about this crime
whatsoever. After confirming the facts of the carrying-out
of the adoption to Bill Jabin and Yountville law enforcement
on Monday, June 9th, we have been ignored and even blamed
for the crime.
Sergeant Berg of Yountville indicated that the criminal
abduction and illegal conspiracy was our fault because we are
bad people and that he was going to do nothing about it. Bill
Jabin has ignored our concerned phone calls for four days.
Harry Martin has been informed, and Neil Bowman Davis, the
Family Law Facilitator at the Self Help Center in the Napa
Courthouse,was informed. Regarding concealment alone,the
District Attorney should have picked up charges on this months
ago, since Napa County authorities were aware of the crime
months ago.
We know for a fact that if this crime was perpetrated by low
income people, the system would have completed a child
welfare check the first day that such a report came in. But the
conscientious Napa County authorities did nothing. This is due
to the corruption and favoritism of the rich in Napa County.
There has been not so much as one simple child welfare check at
the Feeney’s house to verify Jeffrey Funes report that our child is
there. In fact, there has not even been a single police report taken
with a number assigned to it by Sergeant Berg or theNapa Police,
who were also called on June 9, 2008. It is illegal not to take a
police report and assign a number to it when a crime is reported.
We are going to expose this matter. We have many ways of doing
this which include the use of the Internet. The information we have
includes all correspondence made with authorities, non-confidential
paperwork, and incriminating e-mail evidence.
Obviously, upon the report of an abduction, a police report should
have been taken the first day, and a welfare check completed
immediately. Upon finding the child where he reported to be living
at this time, the parties should also have been arrested and require
to show any and all paperwork they have concerning any legal tie to
the child (which of course would be fraudulent).
We are, quite frankly, appalled by the irresponsible, uncouth
behaviors and attitudes of the Napa authorities, their haughtiness
and evident favoritism toward the wealthy, and the lawlessness
that they are endorsing through their negligence. Apparently they
have some type of strange agenda given the fact that if our facts
were incorrect, Jabin should have already called and verified this.
There is no need for a lengthy investigation to resolve this.
We are requesting your assistance in bringing an end to the
perpetuation of this serious crime since you have the power
and influence as Mayor of Napa, Mayor of St. Helena and
Mayor of Yountville, Napa County District Attorney Gary
Allen Lieberstein, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, and
President George W. Bush to make this happen.
We have already informed the guardians of their violations of
the U.S. Statutes which are:
U.S. CODE TITLE 42-THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
CHAPTER 21-CIVIL RIGHTS SUB CHAPTER-GENERALLY
Sec. 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights.
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance,
regulation,custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or
the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected,
any citizen of the United States orother person within the
jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of anyrights, privileges,
or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws,
shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in
equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in
any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or
omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive
relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was
violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes
of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the
District of Columbiashall be considered to be a statute of the District
of Columbia.
(R.S. Sec. 1979; Pub. L. 96-170, Sec.1, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284;
Pub. L. 104-317, title III, Sec.309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853.)
Codification
R.S. Sec. 1979 derived from act Apr.20, 1871, ch. 22, Sec. 1, 17
Stat. 13.
Section was formerly classified to section 43 of Title 8, Aliens and
Nationality.
Amendments
1996-Pub. L. 104-317 inserted before period at end of first
sentence “, except that in any action brought against a judicial
officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial
capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory
decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable”.
1979-Pub. L. 96-170 inserted “or the District of Columbia” after
“Territory”, and provisions relating to Acts of Congress applicable
solely to the District of Columbia.
Effective Date of 1979 Amendment
Amendment for deprivation of rights, privileges, or immunities
secured by the Constitution and laws occurring after Dec. 29, 1979,
see section 3 of Pub. L. 96-170, set out as a note under section 1343
of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
U.S. CODE TITLE 42-THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
CHAPTER 21-CIVIL RIGHTS SUB CHAPTER I-GENERALLY
Sec. 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights.
(1) Preventing officer from performing duties
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to
prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting
or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United
States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by like
means any officer of the United States to leave any State, district, or
place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or
to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful
discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful
discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt,
hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties;
(2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror
If by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of
the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any
matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such
party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so
attended or testified, or to influence the verdict, presentment, or
indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure
such juror in his person or property on account of any verdict,
presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being
or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the
purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any
manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent
to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure
him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce,
the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of
the laws;
(3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in
disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose
of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of
persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and
immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering
the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or
securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal
protection of the laws; or if two or more persons conspire to prevent by
force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to
vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or
in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector
for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the
United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account
of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this
section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done,
any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another
is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and
exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the
party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of
damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or
more of the conspirators.
(R.S. Sec. 1980.)
Codification
R.S. Sec. 1980 derived from acts July 31, 1861, ch. 33, 12 Stat.
284; Apr. 20, 1871, ch. 22, Sec. 2, 17 Stat. 13.
Section was formerly classified to section 47 of Title 8, Aliens and
Nationality.
U.S. CODE TITLE 42-THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
CHAPTER 21-CIVIL RIGHTS SUBCHAPTER I-GENERALLY
Sec. 1986. Action for neglect to prevent
Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired
to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this title, are about to
be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the
commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful
act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal
representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such
person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages
may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons
guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants
in the action; and if the death of any party be caused by any such
wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased
shall have such action there for, and may recover not exceeding $5,000
damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there
be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of
kin of the deceased. But no action under the provisions of this section
shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the
cause of action has accrued.
(R.S. Sec. 1981.)
Codification
R.S. Sec. 1981 derived from act Apr.20, 1871, ch. 22, Sec. 6, 17
Stat. 15.
Section was formerly classified to section 48 of Title 8, Aliens and
Nationality.
Furthermore, we are informing you of the following U.S. Statutes
that apply to you upon any possible failure to comply with U. S.
Statutes listed above and below, this becomes a U.S. Code Title
18 Violation, as also listed below after Title 42 listed below. Please see the following:
U.S. CODE TITLE 42-THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
CHAPTER 21-CIVIL RIGHTS SUB CHAPTER I-GENERALLY
Sec. 1986. Action for neglect to prevent
1) United States Code Title 18, Part-1Chapter-13 Section 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights).
2) United States Code Title 18, Part-1Chapter-13 Section 242 (Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law).
Thank you for your valuable time,
and we wish to hear from you soon.
Please us e-mail us back at your
earliest convenience.
Pursuant To:
Uniform Commercial Code – Article1-General Provisions Part 2 §1-207
Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.
(1) A party who with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance
or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not
thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice”, “under protest”
or the like are sufficient.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to an accord and satisfaction.
Signed,
James A. Sablan Sr. and Sarah L. Matlock
e-mail: jamessablan@yahoo.com
e-mail: woodsonsarah@yahoo.com
The Lion Of Judah: "The Lion Hath Roared, Who Will Not Fear?" Amos Chapter 3, Verse 8 - King James Version 